Back

Report #198,648

Report Details

closedover 7 yearsfor Game 5498965
Trolling on day 1. Decided to make a game action contingent on my answer about hamburgers. I asked him to stop trolling like 5 times. Said "it's a reaction test" when I was uncc'd bomb. So clearly not a reaction test, not that it would've been believable as one had I been unclear. Just pure stubborn trolling and thinking he can dodge the rules with terrible excuses.
deletedover 7 years
arcbell had a straightforward MO as the clear to lynch his scumread and your refusal to acknowledge that read beyond the realm of a mundane culinary investigation is inexcusable.
deletedover 7 years
his indication that he asked you to stop multiple times was telling enough. none of those questions were contingent on the game but passing it off as a nonsensical reaction test against an uncc'd suggests to me that you did this for no other reason than to get a rise out of him. it was disruptive, and your persistence in driving the inquiry despite warnings not to requires no further substantiation as to whether or not he was upset. all in all, it was disruptive.
over 7 years
honestly i think that arcbell might have some unusual burger cooking rituals and if i did touch on a nerve there then im sorry
over 7 years
Trolling can be "Antagonizing other players" i asked him if i was upsetting him and he didnt reply so i assumed not. "disrupting gameplay through actions or communications" i dont think i did this at all since i was playing seriously despite my question to arcbell. "otherwise playing to get negative reactions from other players" again i asked arcbell if he was getting upset by my question and if he had said yes i would have stopped because i am not a rulebreaker