Riddler can change the profile to "when I selfshrink, it's for three reasons" and boom. Problem solved

people are so whiny jesus christ. there is nothing wrong with his profile

Also. It's more of an explanation it seems, of why he self-shrinks. He never said that he self shrinks all the time.

I agree with Riddler. This doesn't look like a deliberate attempt at using OGI to harass and possibly affect the thoughts of other players in a game of DLYV with Riddler. It looks more like Riddler's opinion, which in all truth, it completely allowed to be stated. Opinions were never meant to be argued over. He never flat out said: "If you docjoint, you're a faggot, it's a fact.", but rather appears to have stated his opinion on docjointing. He doesn't like it. That's fine. Neither do I. I agree that it should be reportable. But that's besides the point. I believe that Riddler should not have to take this down from his bio for these reasons.

If it was NOT a rule at the time, then why were people suspended for it? Why was Ichizon able to report me in the first place under that premise?

The rule DID exist at the time as "meta on profile" and you deemed it not meta. To say you're sticking to the ruling because "the rule didn't exist" is horseshit.
http://i.imgur.com/0YTAN.png
The rule I was reported for "breaking" when you made your original decision was in fact an actual rule. Since then it has been integrated into "OGI." You deemed it NOT meta, and it is still NOT meta. It has been in my profile for 5 months with no issues. I do NOT use it as meta. It does NOT state that I do it every game, it's an explanation of why I do it when I do do it. It is NOT meta.

all of the original comments are gone.

Riddler - You have exactly 24 hours to remove that from your profile. If it is not removed, I will clear your bio. It IS meta, and I ruled in your favor before because that rule at the time did not exist. It does now. So remove it.

i support Riddler ~

Laexio, you're ignoring that this isn't meta. You're literally abusing your authority.

Doesn't have to be followed.

"The violation would come from using meta in-game, and I haven't done that."

I don't deserve a violation either. The violation would come from using meta in-game, and I haven't done that. Not to mention I'm not breaking any rules, not to mention this isn't meta. Nice corruption, Laexio?

I agree with Solaster, it needs to be taken down. Solaster, you have my support in clearing Riddler's bio and giving him a violation if you feel that's necessary.

If I weren't annoyed as shit that this is even being considered I'd think about it.

I see no reason any action should be taken and this report should be closed.

No, I would not, simply because there is no reason for this report to actually exist. It's not meta and that's all there is to it.

I'm kind of half and half on this one. I don't think it is clearly stated meta, as it doesn't say he always does it. But I also do not think it isn't unclearly stated meta, as he does not specify the frequency with which he does it.

In my opinion, ideally, a compromise should be made in which riddler slightly changes it to read, "I occasionally self-shrink for three reasons, two of which are pro-town" or "If I am to decide to self-shrink, three factors were taken into account, two of which were pro-town."

Would you be willing to do that, Riddler, and Solaster/Laexio do you think that would be fair?

It's been there for five months.
Literally no one has had a problem with it other than the two people I myself reported.
The only reason this report exists is because Fading is a bitch.
I've not broken a rule and this shouldn't even be considered.

You're right, it didn't say ANYTHING about it. I'm NOT breaking a rule. The only rule you guys have is "clearly stated meta on profiles" and that is NOT what this is. And you're trying to twist my words into a negative, I don't use it as a "reference", I keep it there so I can copy it when I need it. I DON'T use it to prove my side, I DON'T use it as meta and I never have.

Other mod opinions? I still think it needs to be taken down, what it boils down to is he has that on his profile so he can use it for reference in a game he's playing. Riddler show me where it was mentioned in the rules 5 months ago under OGI, because the rules I was reading didn't say anything about it.

shieldbearer• 3 days 22 hours

I have seen you NOT do it more than once. You use it as a weapon when it suits you.

But only retards actually thought you were doing everytime anyway...

The rule you are citing is "meta on profile" which has been moved under OGI.
I didn't break the meta on profile rule then, I'm not breaking the OGI rule now.
It is NOT stating that I do it every time.
It is NOT breaking any rules.
I will NOT be removing it.

This particular rule has not changed. On top of that, the rule is NOT being broken. It is NOT meta.

It wasn't against the rules five months ago. The rules have since been amended and it's now against the rules under OGI.

I like it there. It gives me an easy way to copy it so I can use it in a game without having to type it every time. If someone goes to neg me for what I did post game, it's in my profile for justification.

Why do you want it gone so bad?